Proposal Assignment Essays - Ancient Greek Philosophy, Philosophy

Proposal Assignment Plato's theory against democracy is explained in Richard D. Parry's, "The Craft of Ruling in Plato's Euthydemus and Republic." Plato's theory against democracy is based on "craft". Plato doesn't believe that the general public should matter in making decisions, he believes that no matter which craft we do, it is the opinion of the experts in such craft that matter. On the topic of democracy, politics is a craft therefore not everyone can be a leader, you need experience and certain traits that qualify you to be a successful leader. However, Plato's theory is that "an expert with the skill of ruling will not be elected because citizens tend to vote for the most popular candidate" (Class Notes). When he mentions the most popular candidate, he is referring to a candidate that has good personal skills, says what people want to hear, true knowledge of the economy, etc. Parry states in his article that "craft analogy implies that craft is an instrumental good, not good in itself. Since Soc rates holds that virtue is good in itself, his account of virtue - in this case wisdom - in terms of craft is inconsistent" (2). This is basically explaining that Socrates had his virtue is good and that he had good wisdom but that his performance in his craft was inconsistent. The source I used to explain craft analogy is credible because it is an academic journal that was written by an author who received his Ph.D. and is a professor who's teaching and scholarly interests included the history of ancient Greek philosophy, philosophy of Plato, philosophy of Aristotle, medieval philosophy, and contemporary analytic philosophy. It is relevant to my proposal because it explain Plato's craft of ruling in depth. To object to Plato's theory, Dr. Kazuya Fukuoka explains why democracy works in his article "What Makes Democracy Work?". This is a credible source because it is written by a professor who received his Ph.D. and teaches "Introduction to Comparative Politics" at Saint Joseph's University. This helps my proposal because it is explaining why Democracy works which goes against Plato's theory of "craft ruling". He explains that democracy "is a system of government implemented with the intent that no one branch or department of government can ever gain too much power. There are limitations of power placed on each part of the government, thus forcing each department to work together, ensuring that the best interest of the people is maintained". This goes against Plato because Plato wants experts to make decisions and not the best interest of the people. He also states that "Democracy is also institutionalized through the voting process. Democracies are denoted by having free and fair electi ons (Linz and Stepan 1996, 15). This means that the voting process is for the most part untainted. Those running for offices are to run clean campaigns. No one person should have a monopoly of the media during their campaign. Each person should have the same ability to get there name and beliefs out there for the public to know". This also helps me go against Plato because this is the complete opposite of what Plato believed in and despised the idea of everybody having the same ability of becoming a leader. This can help me write my paper because it gives me an idea of why democracy works. It educates me on the functionality of democracy and how it works. So when comparing this to Plato's idea to democracy, it is very useful. These ideas presented in this article are all facts and don't involve any opinion to them so it is a credible source to use.

The Lorax Essays

The Lorax Essays The Lorax Essay The Lorax Essay Earth were never so heavy until we started to exploit it for resources. Natural resources used to be thought to be limitless, but soon they will be gone. Everything on Earth is created to support life; instead of appreciating them, we take them for granted. As the population increases, the condition of the environment decreases. The more people there are, the more demand there is, and the more supply are needed. The biggest influence that has occurred so far is the Industrial Revolution. We have destroyed natural forests and habitats to clear land for houses ND industries. We burn forests to create space to plant food and raise livestock. We exploit coal and other fossil fuels to create energy. Every activity that we do involves electricity. Our desires for quality life never stop. We want everything to be technological, modern, and convenient. We live fast, so fast that we cannot see the stop sign. We have gone over the limit that the Earth can handle. Cutting down the forests destroys other species habitats and causes erosion. Burning down the forests releases huge amount of CO, which contributes to global warming and hanged in global climate patterns. Burning coal for electricity is devastating. It also releases CO and greenhouse gases, which cause global warming, Ice melting, and coral reef dying. Smoke from Industries damages the ozone layer and causes acid rain. Additionally, the demand for food and clean water gives a lot of countries problems. We do not have enough food for many people because of climate change and poverty.

International criminal law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

International criminal law - Essay Example that has broken out in Asterixia since 1999, there is evidence existing that gross human rights violations have taken place - â€Å"crimes against humanity†6 or crimes committed within the context of a war situation. In assessing the criminal liability that will accrue upon the state of Asterixia, the provisions of various international conventions must be considered while criminal liability of President Killinger and General Nipochet could arise under the ICTY which has clearly spelt out the liabilities of a Commander for atrocities committed by subordinates and be adjudicated through the ICC. The term â€Å"crimes against humanity† was first coined after the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks in 19157 however all such diplomatic initiatives after World War I to â€Å"act on behalf of humanity† proved inconclusive8. The International Military tribunal at Nuremberg was criticized on the basis of it being equivalent to implement of justice by the victor9 however it was the first step to the setting up of an international forum to question State immunity in the case of international crimes.10 But as deGuzman points out, it was only after the establishment of the ad hoc tribunals at Yugoslavia in 1993 and Rwanda in 1994 that international justice has been activated11. The ICTY12 was authorized to bring to justice and prosecute those persons accused of crimes against humanity â€Å"when †¦.directed against any civilian population.†13 The ICTR on the other hand, came into being to tackle the heinous criminal activity generated by the Rwandan conflict13a – however both these tribunals have made it possible to try individuals for their crimes in an international criminal forum. The International criminal Court which came into being in 2002, has jurisdiction over nationals for crimes occurring on the territory of all states that have ratified the Rome Statute.14 Article 98(2) of the Rome Statute is specifically meant to protect against the ICC being used as a basis